Sherrinford Holmes // Dr. Telephosphor (
getoutofmylab) wrote in
omegafriends2014-06-02 06:29 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)
A
[audio post]
Ah... So, in a competitive system where each individual begins with the same opportunities and outcome is influenced only by skill and motivation to succeed - but success is necessarily attained at the expense of others - what characteristics would disqualify an individual from competing altogether?
I ask out of curiosity, as the conditions of a certain ongoing contest seem to parallel those of the world at large. People tend to characterize those who fail to participate in society as lazy or degenerate, but in reality it is the collective that decides whether an individual may compete - and that decision generally has little to do with ability.
My hypothesis is that human beings are not actually comfortable with participating in such a system, but must be convinced and trained to do so. Rejecting those who, for whatever reason, do not fit the competitive model is part of that process.
B
[ action post, later, at the Gold Mill ]
Sherri didn't go much for dancing, but he did enjoy orchestras and jazz music. More than that, the jazz club was a good place to sit and think about recent events with just the right amount of distraction. In any case, the atmosphere seems perfect for slightly-melancholy contemplation and being mysterious while wearing a snazzy suit. If anyone approaches him they will find that he is quite open to company, though.
C
[ less mundane action post, even later, anywhere in the city ]
Someone might have taken that audio post as an invitation - or perhaps they just really wanted to offer some intellectual criticism in the form of punching. Hopefully they won't forget to keep their crit (re)constructive!
[audio post]
Ah... So, in a competitive system where each individual begins with the same opportunities and outcome is influenced only by skill and motivation to succeed - but success is necessarily attained at the expense of others - what characteristics would disqualify an individual from competing altogether?
I ask out of curiosity, as the conditions of a certain ongoing contest seem to parallel those of the world at large. People tend to characterize those who fail to participate in society as lazy or degenerate, but in reality it is the collective that decides whether an individual may compete - and that decision generally has little to do with ability.
My hypothesis is that human beings are not actually comfortable with participating in such a system, but must be convinced and trained to do so. Rejecting those who, for whatever reason, do not fit the competitive model is part of that process.
B
[ action post, later, at the Gold Mill ]
Sherri didn't go much for dancing, but he did enjoy orchestras and jazz music. More than that, the jazz club was a good place to sit and think about recent events with just the right amount of distraction. In any case, the atmosphere seems perfect for slightly-melancholy contemplation and being mysterious while wearing a snazzy suit. If anyone approaches him they will find that he is quite open to company, though.
C
[ less mundane action post, even later, anywhere in the city ]
Someone might have taken that audio post as an invitation - or perhaps they just really wanted to offer some intellectual criticism in the form of punching. Hopefully they won't forget to keep their crit (re)constructive!
no subject
He was not actually sure whether that had been a request for clarification, but he suspected that it was as close to one as he was going to get. It seemed to him that they were having some communication problems that were not entirely on his end - but also that it would be easier on everyone if he acted as though they were.
"Apologies for any miscommunication, but, ah... English is not my first language."
no subject
She had been requesting clarification for a while now.
"I was gifted with a bit of an omni-glot though from my... adoptive family."
She stopped talking for a while after that, seeming to have some trouble with this now.
no subject
"Ah, most sentient species are... opposed to entropy. Humanity, however,... seems to abhor it. Most individuals lack the cognitive capacity to truly understand the concept, but they respond to it emotionally with an intensity that I, ah... unfortunately cannot properly describe. From a scientific standpoint it... inspires awe."
He paused, apparently to collect his thoughts.
"The, ah, probability of a human seeking disorder as an end goal seems so small that, ah... to consider it would not be efficient."
If Samus was uncomfortable talking about her past or linguistics, Sherri did not particularly have a response for it. The number of Skrell who are aware that humans even have multiple languages numbers exactly one: himself, and even then it's not something he quite understands. Being an omni-glot, however, did not particularly increase her likelihood of being able to hear into the sub-sonic range, nor of being able to make syntactical sense of a multi-tonal series of notes, croaks, and clicks.
no subject
"Do you speak in anything other than faux-philosphical narration?" She took a moment before smiling. She decided to get snarky with him.
"Let me translate to speaking normal. Most people are opposed to chaos, humans even moreso than rest. That's not true in the least and even I have a just a modicum of understanding of basic human culture. As for the rest just seems like your fascinated with humanity. Regardless, I never said causing conflict was his end goal. Just that chaos is likely beneficial to the cause he has. Though he could always be an anarchist for all we know."
She had to admit, him seeming to treat humanity as a quaint tourist attraction was something that did irk her deeply. She had a lot of ire for this man. Whoever he was. Fascinated by humans like a quaint tourist attraction and he talked solely in purple prose.
no subject
"Pardon my indiscretion, but am I unknowingly speaking to royalty?" he asked. "That no one has pointed out to you the fact that you seem to speak without putting any thought into it - others must think you above reproach."
Most people couldn't tell when he was being sarcastic, but it was a lot easier to get past that barrier when he didn't care about offending the other person.
"It seems that we are having some difficulty communicating. When you said 'chaos' I thought you meant... ah, the destruction of the entire concept of civilization? But it seems that you actually meant 'a distraction.'"
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Congratulations, you both have big dictionaries. Sheeeeeeez. Put a collective cork in it! Some of us are trying to work, here."
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject